Skip to main content
Seller Resources
Arthur Berry & Company  •  April 2026  •  7 min read
Key Takeaways
  • Buyers and lenders compare internal financial statements with tax returns during due diligence.
  • Because the valuation process often requires recasting financial statements, differences between the two are common but must be explainable.
  • Schedule M-1 is a useful starting point for understanding where book income and taxable income diverge. It does not capture everything a buyer or lender needs to see.
  • Clear, consistent financial records and documentation that connects the two make the sale process more credible and due diligence faster.

Why Buyers Compare Financial Statements to Tax Returns

For Idaho business owners preparing to sell, one of the first things buyers and lenders examine is how financial statements align with filed tax returns. When those two documents tell different stories, it creates questions that need answers before a deal can move forward.

Most owners prepare internal financial statements throughout the year to track revenue, expenses, and profitability. These reports help guide operational decisions and measure how the business is performing.

Buyers and lenders do not rely on internal reports alone. Lenders typically require three years of signed tax returns to evaluate a business. Reviewing both allows them to assess whether the financial picture is consistent and whether the numbers will hold up under scrutiny.

The goal is not to find identical numbers. Buyers and lenders want to see that the business’s financial performance is explainable across both sets of records.

Why Financial Statements and Tax Returns Often Look Different

It is completely normal for financial statements and tax returns to show different numbers. The two documents are created for different purposes.

Financial statements are typically prepared to understand how the business is performing operationally. Tax returns follow IRS rules designed to determine taxable income.

Because of that difference, certain items are treated differently between the two.

Common examples include:

  • Depreciation may not even be included in internal P&Ls
  • Non-deductible expenses recorded in internal financials
  • Timing differences for revenue or expenses
  • Owner compensation adjustments
  • One-time adjustments and/or discretionary expenses, which are often the most significant differences a buyer will encounter and the ones that require the most explanation

These differences are often partially captured on the corporate tax return through Schedule M-1, which covers timing differences in depreciation, non-deductible expenses, and Section 179 adjustments. That makes it a useful starting point for understanding where the numbers diverge.

However, Schedule M-1 does not reconcile the tax return to recast financial statements. When a business is being valued for sale, additional adjustments require separate documentation. The goal is to clearly trace those adjustments back to the tax return so that buyers and lenders can follow the numbers.

A well-documented set of records gives buyers a clear path through the numbers.

Why this matters: Buyers are not simply confirming that the numbers add up. They are evaluating whether the financial story is consistent, traceable, and credible enough to support the purchase price.

Common Pitfalls That Create Red Flags

As noted above, some difference between financial statements and tax returns is expected. Problems arise when those differences are large or cannot be explained.

Some of the most common issues buyers encounter include:

Inconsistent bookkeeping

Financial statements may be updated irregularly or contain adjustments that were never reflected in the tax filings.

Aggressive tax strategies

Some businesses minimize taxable income as much as possible. If that minimization has been too aggressive, it will reduce the business’s value at sale and create more ground to cover during buyer due diligence.

Undocumented recast adjustments

Recasting the financial statements is a normal part of preparing a business for sale. The risk arises when those adjustments are not documented clearly enough to trace back to the tax return. Buyers and lenders reviewing add-backs and adjustments need to be able to verify them independently. Without that documentation trail, even legitimate adjustments can become sticking points.

Financial statements prepared only for a sale

When internal financial reports are suddenly “cleaned up” just before going to market, buyers often question the lack of continuity.

These situations do not automatically prevent a sale, but they can slow down due diligence and create skepticism among buyers and lenders.

Most business owners face a natural tension between minimizing taxes and demonstrating profitability. The goal is not to eliminate tax planning — the goal is to maintain records that accurately reflect business performance while still complying with tax regulations.

Reviewing Financial Records Before Selling

Most business owners maintain financial records as part of running their company. When considering a future sale, it is worth confirming those records clearly reflect how the business operates and correlate to the tax return.

Before going to market, we often recommend that owners take time to verify that financial documentation is organized and easy for buyers to understand.

A few areas worth reviewing include:

  • Clearly documenting discretionary expenses and potential recast adjustments with enough detail to trace them back to the tax return
  • Maintaining consistent bookkeeping practices year to year
  • Reviewing financial records with professional advisors before beginning the sale process

Taking these steps helps buyers quickly understand the company’s financial performance and how the numbers connect across financial statements and tax filings.

The Bottom Line

Financial statements and tax returns do not need to match line for line, but there should be a clear way to connect the dots between the two.

When buyers can see how the numbers connect and understand the reasons behind any differences, the due diligence process moves forward with far less friction. Clear financial documentation builds credibility, reduces delays, and ultimately helps transactions close with greater confidence.

Thinking About How Your Financials Would Look Under Buyer Scrutiny?

Taking time to review how financial statements align with tax filings can make future conversations with buyers far more productive. A confidential business evaluation is often a helpful first step in that process.

Request a Business Evaluation
Get in Touch
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Miranda Cotten, MBA — Arthur Berry & Company

Miranda Cotten, MBA — Arthur Berry & Company

Miranda Cotten, MBA, is the media and communications lead at Arthur Berry & Company. She combines her background in financial analysis and risk evaluation with the firm’s decades of brokerage expertise to deliver clear, actionable insights for business owners and investors.

(208) 336-8000